(c)1990 Golden Triangle, Inc. (c)1990 Wilson Van Alst All rights reserved. Fm: Tim Celeski To: All I have finally got good news on the Mac to WP2 connection. After trying ust about everything, with mostly unacceptable results, I have come up with a reliable way to get the two to communicate simply and reliably. Mac to WP2 Communication For communication, I've tried just about every peramitter you can come up with using Microphone on the Mac, and the built in communication software that comes with the WP2. As a lot of people have noted, the WP2 seems to have problems processing data coming in at high speeds. Going out is another matter. I have had a lot of problems using Microphone in both Xmodem and ASCII to transfer files coming and going from the WP2. Xmodem Mac to WP2 delivers a file to the Mac without any sort of creator or type, forcing you to add one using DiskTop or ResEdit. Sending Xmodem to the WP2 puts a lot of garbage at the end of the file, causing corruption, sometimes bad enough to force a cold start of the WP2. ASCII text transfers to the Mac at even high speed work well, except you always end up with carriage returns, forcing you to use a utility to get them out. Going the other way, you end up in the same situation on the WP2, except you don't have anyway to get them out, except manually. Here's what I've found to work. Using Microsoft Works' communication module, coming and going at 1200 baud in Xmodem, data mode, all works well and cleanly. You could send to the Mac at higher speed if you want, but not the other way around. Once the file is transferred to the Mac, open it up in the WP module of Works, save it or convert it to any other format (Word for example) and your done (Sometimes you get a few extra characters at the bottom of the file, just cut them out). Going from Mac to WP2 is the same process reversed. I'm sure that equal results are possible in other communication programs, but I haven't had any luck so far with Microphone. But, at least I have a reliable and quite simple way to move data between the two machines. Anybody comes up with improved ways of doing this let me know. - 0 - Starting message #: 190193 Starting date: 17-Nov-89 08:35:15 Participants: Tim Celeski 74746,1145